A connected LMS for schools
The whole school, moving as one.
Curriculum, classroom work, assessment, support and communication usually live in different places, and every handoff costs time, context, or a learner who needed someone to notice. Peach keeps them in one system, so each role gets a workspace built for it and the record underneath stays shared.
- AI with visible provenance
- Curriculum-aligned
- People in control
Schools lose momentum at the handoffs.
Not inside any one tool — between them. The intent is written in one place, taught from another, evidenced in a third, and reconstructed at the end of the cycle for a report.
- 01CurriculumThe intent lives in frameworks and planning documents.
- 02ClassroomTeachers rebuild that intent as lessons and assignments.
- 03Student workThe richest evidence arrives in yet another queue.
- 04SupportInterventions wait for someone to connect the pattern by hand.
- 05ReportingGrades and comments are reassembled at the end of the cycle.
Every arrow between those is a place a school loses time, context, or a learner who needed someone to notice.
Focused workspaces, one shared record.
Each role gets a surface built for what it actually does. Underneath, people, classes, curriculum and evidence are the same records — entered once, carried through the work.
“Tasks that once took hours now take minutes. My students love the instant feedback!”
“Peach brings variety to my classroom and saves me SO much time on feedback.”
“Finally, an AI tool that actually gets education. The insights are incredibly helpful.”
“The detailed post-workshop reports with strengths, improvements, and practical suggestions help us provide targeted support that accelerates student growth.”
AI, woven in
AI you can see the working of.
Assistance sits on the working surface — drafting an assignment, reading a class, proposing a grade — rather than in a separate chatbot. Wherever AI touched something a person is judged by, it says so.
- Provenance travels with the work
- A mark an AI pass proposed carries that fact through to the student's own report. It is never presented as though a teacher wrote it.
- Proposals wait for a person
- Nothing an agent drafts is published by the act of drafting it. Proposals wait in a queue for a person to accept, change, or decline.
- Deterministic where trust matters
- Suggested actions on a class are rule-derived, not generated, so the same class state always produces the same list.
- Work that finishes without you
- Longer jobs run on their own and post back what they did, step by step, in plain language.
Your curriculum lives inside the work.
Outcomes and frameworks are not a separate document to reconcile at reporting time. They are attached to units, assignments and evidence as the work happens, so coverage and progress are read from real student work rather than reassembled from it.
- Planners built for your framework, owned by the curriculum program with school-level fallback
- Skill progress and holistic profiles alongside subject results
- Program components, where your framework has them
Curriculums supported
- International Baccalaureate
- Early YearsPYPMYPDiploma Programme
- UK and international
- GCSEIGCSEO LevelA Level
- India
- CBSECBSE-i
- United States
- California State StandardsTexas TEKSFlorida B.E.S.T.New York Next GenerationIllinois Learning StandardsGeorgia Standards of Excellence
- Australia
- Australian Curriculum
Not on the list? Tell us on the first call. A framework is configuration rather than new machinery here, so standing one up takes us about a day.